Print This Post Print This Post

Kindly tell me what is lacking for this man to be a totalitarian dictator?

Watch the video clip (its only 35 seconds long). Then come back and tell me if this man does not have ALL the ingredients to be a dictator on the order of Stalin, Mao, Hitler, etc.?

Obama At Health Care Summit: “I Don’t Count My Time Because I’m The President”

Apparently Obama has NEVER heard that NO ONE is above the law, the rules of debate, or civility.

There again, he probably has. And, like all dictator wannabes, just doesn’t give a rip.

Share
Print This Post Print This Post

We would do well to consider the import and full meaning behind the surprised statement of Julius Caesar in Shakespeare’s play mere moments before his death. There is an awful lot of meaning packed into those three words. Primarily, the mind focuses on betrayal, but that would be to miss the deeper meaning behind the event itself.

Though it is not known what Julius actually stated before he died, what is known is that the event which occurred a bit over two millennia ago speaks to a truism about power, and where anyone’s actual power on this earth comes from. At one point Julius had at his disposal the resources of the entire Roman Empire. Along with that he could, at his whim, call forth any number of individuals in various positions of power throughout the Empire, and have them do his bidding. It was an envied position, but a rather dangerous one.

It was dangerous because of the mode of Julius’ acquisition of power. It was not legitimate and done by the application of force. Hence, whatever legal protection Julius might have enjoyed, he had destroyed by his own behavior. Nonetheless, for a time, all those under him were willing, for various and sundry reasons, to follow Julius, lending support as he required it. It was a heady position to occupy, much like the positions enjoyed by some in government today. After all, when there is no real accountability, who is to complain about what you do, especially when those subordinate to you do as you require without murmur or question.

But something went wrong in the days, weeks, and months before the demise of Julius. That something was unthinkable to Caesar. After all, he had loyal friends who would follow his orders and let him know if things were amiss. Moreover, there were many others who followed the law as it was popularly understood, and would do nothing against Julius, he being the Emperor and the source of all power — or so it seemed.

However, what began as mere disagreement and disapproval grew and became something far more dangerous to Julius. As so often is the case, those who are unhappy find others who are in a similar state and of like mind, and begin assessing their prospects. And as it is in this world, when one reaches the peak, there is nowhere to go but down. But when one is not yet there, going up is merely a matter of the will and means to do so. Julius, it seems, had only one direction to go. . .

There is a point in which support, and thus power, which is the ability to control individuals and events, is at a maximum for anyone in a position of power. Unfortunately for Julius, that maximum had come — and gone. Unbeknownst to Julius, his power was eroding as the days went by, and the power of those in opposition was ascending. At some point the paths of ascent and descent would cross, and Julius would find himself fighting for his life. It is, after all, very difficult for one man — alone, to rule a hostile and unsupportive empire. At the point the knives came out, the title of Caesar meant very little. When one has nothing to trade with, save a title unrecognized by those about them, one is bereft of anything useful to preserve his life, save the good graces of his enemies. Unfortunately for Julius, those around him cared nothing about the character trait of graciousness — kind of like Julius caring nothing for legalities when he seized power.

It is a deceptive thing, power being what it is. It is elusive, much desired, and cultivated by various means. Some good and honorable, and most not so good and honorable. There is yet another truism at play here. That is, how you get power is how you keep power. In the sad tale of Julius (it is sad, but not a tragedy as some suppose — he earned it) both truisms were either missed or misunderstood. Like so many, Julius thought he was the source of his power, that by force of will, his desire would be carried out by those around him and subordinate to him. He was quite mistaken.

What so many who have attained power have missed is that true power flows from those who give their loyalty and support willingly, freely and without any coercion. True power is arrived at when no form of enticement or inducement is used to gain the support of those around you. Rather, the support is given because they believe what is stated and the one they are entrusting the sweat of their brow and labor of their hands to, does indeed care for them, and truly holds the same affections as they. This in turn supports them and the first cause in their lives, which is most often their kith and kin.


We the People of the United States, in Order to  form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility,  provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the  Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish  this Constitution for the United States of America.


I just wonder where its power comes from . . .

Share
Print This Post Print This Post

The story about Obama’s executive order will not go away, so writes Anthony G. Martin in his Examiner column. In the column he references several other blogs and a couple of MSM articles where note of the EO has been taken, which is a good thing that they have finally noticed the Executive Order and its potential effect.

However, there is a persistent thread that runs through this whole story which irks to no end. It irritates me for one simple reason: It’s wrong. Yep, WRONG! Just plain wrong — in spades it’s wrong.

The part that is wrong is this:

“Put simply, this means the Constitution is no longer the supreme law of the land in America. Thanks to Executive Order 12425 , which Obama signed Dec. 16 without explaining why, the supreme law of the land is now arguably whatever Interpol says it is, most likely as directed by the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands, in conjunction with the United Nations.”

Excuse me while I go to my neighbor’s barn and begin shoveling . . .

Is it really to the point in this nation that even the supposedly educated conservatives cannot put simple concepts together and come to a reasonable, sensible conclusion? To what do I speak? This line:

“Put simply, this means the Constitution is no longer the supreme law of the land in America. Thanks to Executive Order 12425,

BS — pure and simple. Why? Excuse me while I treat some as simple-minded children, but they have earned it. Please consider the following:

ARTICLE II
SECTION 1. Clause 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:

Fair enough? The office of the President of the United States DOES NOT EXIST OUTSIDE THE FRAMEWORK OF THE CONSTITUTION! Got it?

Dang, I hope so!

Logically it follows that all powers he exercises CAN ONLY BE EXERCISED WITHIN THAT FRAMEWORK OF THE CREATION AND EXISTENCE OF THE OFFICE CREATED BY SAID CONSTITUTION!

Do you get that? I sure hope so!

Now, would we suppose it logical or reasonable that the President, whose office only exists because the Constitution created it and can issue Executive Orders only within the capacity of that office, to bring into existence an order that effectively nullifies the very authority that created his office in the first place?

If he did, would it not render him a pretender to the office? Would it not also abolish his very reason for existence?

Read carefully: If the President acts to nullify the very authority that created his office, does he not render himself without office, and without authority? Just where does the Office of President get its authority in the first place?

From Mars?

Are the people of this nation so freaking STUPID as to believe that ONE MAN, with the stroke of a pen, can render the Constitution NULL AND VOID — especially when his whole authority flows from the Constitution in the first place?

Get this: If the morons in government render the Federal Constitution NULL AND VOID, they do not have a reason for existing in their jobs — BECAUSE THE WHOLE REASON FOR THEIR POSITIONS FLOWS FROM THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF!

Talk about cutting your own throat . . .

The whole reason they try to PRETEND what they are doing is Constitutional is because they know that without that pretense they are operating without reason for existence. Hence, they are pretenders and an illegal operation, subject to be removed from power at the slightest whim. In fact, they could be, and should be considered enemies of the United States.

So it is that they need the cover of the Federal Constitution, and will do nothing that would openly show the document to not be in force and effect.

It really does make me wonder just who is on what side, and if all that “education” is really just a cover for the total loss of common sense in America.

I am reminded of Obadiah:

How are the things of Esau searched out! how are his hidden things sought up! All the men of thy confederacy have brought thee even to the border: the men that were at peace with thee have deceived thee, and prevailed against thee; they that eat thy bread have laid a wound under thee: there is none understanding in him. Shall I not in that day, saith the LORD, even destroy the wise men out of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau? (Obadiah 6-8)

Just substitute “America” everywhere the names “Edom” and “Esau” appear — it fits.

BTW, the EO is unconstitutional — but it doesn’t overthrow the Constitution itself. No, all that has to happen is to call a spade a spade and hold the “Enlightened One’s” feet to the fire and make him rescind the EO.1

One last point: It should be noted (and Mama Liberty especially take note) that the only way the Federal Constitution can be nullified and overthrown is if the American people and the several states REFUSE TO ENFORCE IT!


  1. He needs to rescind a whole bunch of other things too, but I am not going to address those here. []
Share